As Bitcoin makes international headlines again, with its recent surge to an all time high of $111,000, let’s take a moment to look past the fireworks. Because while the price chart might be screaming “bull run,” the underlying narrative that Bitcoin has matured into a stable safe haven asset, deserves a bit more scrutiny.

Much of this recent rally coincided with Trump’s announcement to extend the EU tariff deadline, a move that stirred global uncertainty and, predictably, the markets. And surely enough, Bitcoin bounced. Cue the takes: “digital gold,” “inflation hedge,” “crisis asset.” We’ve heard them all before. But are we really witnessing Bitcoin’s arrival as a flight to safety asset or are we just reading too much into a green candle?

Let’s look at the numbers. In the face of market jitters, Bitcoin has gained over 20 percent, while traditional equities have retreated by about 1 percent. Gold, long considered the yardstick for safe havens, has inched up modestly. At face value, it’s tempting to say Bitcoin is proving its grit.

But the historical context tells a different story. As seen in 2022, Bitcoin’s price collapsed by more than 65 percent during a period of monetary tightening and high profile crypto failures. In contrast, gold held steady, even gaining 1.5 percent, and outperformed both equities and bonds amid the chaos.

What this shows is that Bitcoin’s movements tend to reflect speculative risk on appetite rather than an innate ability to preserve value. In other words: the surge may be exciting, but it’s not necessarily reassuring.

So, what makes something a “safe haven” anyway?

Traditionally, it’s an asset that retains or gains value when markets enter panic mode. Think low volatility, inverse correlation to risk assets, ample liquidity, and a high degree of trust. Gold fits that description, as do US Treasuries (most of the time).

Bitcoin? Not quite.

While it is dominating the narrative, it’s not dominating the scoreboard. Year to date, it’s up 13 percent. Respectable, until you look at local names that silently out-do the crypto giant.

At the DFM and ADX, year-to-date increases for these equities silence the Bitcoin mania. ADIB up 44.7%. Parkin up 37.6%. DU, 23.9%.  ARMX, 23.2%. DIB, 21%. FAB, 19.5%. ADCB 17.6%. Air Arabia, 16.6%. And that’s after paying out dividends north of 5 percent in many cases.

So investors not only saw capital appreciation, they got income along the way. Real returns from real businesses tied to the UAE’s economic engine: transport, telecom, banking, infrastructure. These aren’t headline grabbers. They’re wealth builders.

Yes, institutional interest in Bitcoin is rising, and yes, ETFs and on chain analytics are adding legitimacy. But its track record is still shaped by wild swings, speculative trading, and meme fueled manias. Bitcoin doesn’t reliably act as a counterweight to equities in downturns, and until it does, it’s premature to treat it like a hedge.

There’s also the regulatory uncertainty. While the UAE has made strides with digital asset frameworks, the global picture remains murky. And in times of stress, murky isn’t the ideal scenario for most investors.

Bitcoin is evolving. There’s no denying that. And for those of us watching the UAE emerge as a crypto forward market, with events like Token2049, a maturing regulatory environment, and increasing investor appetite, that evolution matters.

But evolution doesn’t mean arrival.

Investors in this region, especially newer entrants, should resist the urge to mistake momentum for meaning. Yes, Bitcoin has upside potential, but so do the UAE’s homegrown heavyweights. These aren’t speculative bets. They’re foundational to the economy and backed by regulation, dividends, and long term visibility.

The smarter move? Embrace crypto as part of a diversified strategy, not as a shield. Building wealth in this market isn’t about chasing noise… it’s about cutting through it. In a region actively shaping the future of finance, the real edge isn’t picking sides, it’s understanding both.

---

xCube LLC is licensed by the SCA as a Trading and Clearing Broker. Trading in financial markets involves a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors. The information in this article is sourced from public resources. xCube is not responsible for its accuracy or any decisions made based on it.

Co-written by Siddak Singh Ahuja, CFA and Valentina Rose Gasparian